Stuart Broadbent - Obsolescence Director at Alstom Transport and member of the Component Obsolescence Group (COG) - writes in Rail Engineer
"The increased use of electronic systems in rolling stock and rail
infrastructure undoubtedly improves operational efficiency and safety
for the rail operator as well as enhancing the passenger experience. For
the rail engineer, however, these electronic systems come with the
added challenge of managing obsolescence.
Most component and equipment manufacturers are focused on their
next-generation products and on emerging technologies. This reliance on
research and development to provide new revenue streams means that
today’s hot new products quickly become commodity and then legacy parts
as the manufacturers follow timescales which are driven by fast- moving
consumer markets.
Consider the mobile phone industry for example. Mobile-phone
users will expect to upgrade their handsets every 18 to 24 months,
whereas the planned lifecycle for rolling stock usually stretches to 30
or 40 years.
There is also a significant difference in the volume of units shipped
to the consumer and rail industries. Analysts predict that global
shipments of mobile handsets will reach 2.5 billion units in 2014.
Compare that to the amount of components used in rolling stock, signals,
rail infrastructure and passenger information systems and the
difference in the production volumes of the two sectors becomes
apparent."
One way to attack obsolescence is to make sure obsolete PCBs are well documented. A useful tool for doing this - and even recreating the board - is ABI Electronics' RevEng.
Here's an article dealing with the recreation of undocumented PCBs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment